Employment discrimination law in the United States obtains from the common law, and is codified in various state, federal, and regional laws. These laws restrict discrimination based upon specific qualities or "protected classifications". The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state federal governments versus their public workers. Discrimination in the personal sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has actually ended up being based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a variety of locations, consisting of recruiting, hiring, task assessments, promotion policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. State laws frequently extend defense to extra categories or employers.
Under federal employment discrimination law, employers typically can not discriminate versus employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual preference and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] disability (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary details, [10] and citizenship status (for people, permanent locals, momentary homeowners, refugees, and asylees). [11]
List of United States federal discrimination law
Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title IX
Constitutional basis
The United States Constitution does not directly deal with employment discrimination, but its restrictions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to protect federal civil servant.
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny people of "life, liberty, or home", without due procedure of the law. It also includes an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from breaching a person's rights of due procedure and equal security. In the work context, these Constitutional provisions would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with employees, former workers, or task applicants unequally since of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure protection needs that civil servant have a reasonable procedural procedure before they are terminated if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or home interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.
Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their particular government the power to enact civil rights laws that apply to the private sector. The Federal government's authority to manage a private service, consisting of civil rights laws, originates from their power to control all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly pay for some protection from public and private employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only deal with discriminatory treatment by the federal government, including a public company.
Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "authorities powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws developed to safeguard public health, safety and morals. All States must abide by the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States might enact civil liberties laws that offer additional work defense.
For instance, some State civil rights laws use defense from work discrimination on the basis of political association, although such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.
History of federal laws
Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually established gradually.
The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying different earnings based on sex. It does not prohibit other inequitable practices in working with. It provides that where workers perform equal work in the corner requiring "equivalent ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under comparable working conditions," they ought to be provided equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to companies taken part in some element of interstate commerce, or all of a company's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in much more elements of the employment relationship. "Title VII created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to a lot of employers engaged in interstate commerce with more than 15 employees, labor organizations, and employment agencies. Title VII restricts discrimination based on race, color, religious beliefs, sex or national origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon protected attributes concerning terms, conditions, and privileges of work. Employment companies might not discriminate when employing or referring applicants, employment and labor companies are also prohibited from basing subscription or union categories on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination includes discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]
Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal contractors". [14]
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, prohibits companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are nearly similar to those laid out in Title VII, except that the ADEA protects employees in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. A worker is safeguarded from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and restricted obligatory retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer big pensions). The ADEA contains specific standards for advantage, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of most discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy against age discrimination among federal contractors". [15]
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts work discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial help. [16] It needs affirmative action as well as non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs sensible accommodation, and Section 508 requires that electronic and info innovation be available to handicapped employees. [16]
The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators against miners who experience "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]
The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam age veterans by federal specialists". [14]
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids work discrimination on the basis of insolvency or bad debts. [9]
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than three employees from discriminating against anyone (except an unapproved immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove inequitable barriers versus qualified people with specials needs, individuals with a record of a special needs, or individuals who are considered as having a special needs. It restricts discrimination based upon real or viewed physical or mental impairments. It likewise requires employers to supply reasonable lodgings to employees who require them since of a disability to look for a task, carry out the important functions of a job, or take pleasure in the advantages and opportunities of work, unless the company can reveal that unnecessary challenge will result. There are stringent constraints on when a company can ask disability-related questions or require medical exams, and all medical information must be dealt with as confidential. An impairment is defined under the ADA as a mental or physical health condition that "substantially restricts several significant life activities. " [5]
The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, changed in 1993, ensure all individuals equivalent rights under the law and lay out the damages offered to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from using people' genetic information when making hiring, shooting, job placement, or promo choices. [10]
The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual preference and 29 US states do not clearly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.
LGBT employment discrimination
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work defenses for LGBT individuals were patchwork; numerous states and areas explicitly restrict harassment and bias in employment choices on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's identified that transgender workers were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to include sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]
According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT community have actually lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who declares that her employer told her that her existence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]
Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and personal offices. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public workplaces. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have likewise determined that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]
State law
State statutes also offer substantial defense from employment discrimination. Some laws extend comparable defense as supplied by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws supply higher security to employees of the state or of state specialists.
The following table lists classifications not secured by federal law. Age is included too, since federal law only covers employees over 40.
In addition,
- District of Columbia - enlisting, individual look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Place of birth [76]
Government staff members
Title VII likewise applies to state, federal, regional and other public staff members. Employees of federal and state governments have additional protections against employment discrimination.
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not impact task efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually translated this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be broadened to include gender identity. [92]
Additionally, public employees maintain their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies can limits workers' speech in specific methods. [93] Public workers maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a private resident (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]
Federal staff members who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) should take legal action against in the proper federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of problems for plaintiffs.
Exceptions
Authentic occupational certifications
Employers are normally permitted to consider qualities that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are bona fide occupational credentials (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the second most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.
The only exception to this guideline is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police security can match races when needed. For example, if authorities are running operations that include private informants, or undercover agents, sending an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, cops departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]
BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are enabled to cast characters based upon physical qualities, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the home entertainment industry, specifically in performers. [95] This validation is unique to the show business, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]
Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense justification in wage spaces in between different groups of staff members. [96] Cost can be considered when a company should balance personal privacy and safety interest in the variety of positions that a company are trying to fill. [96]
Additionally, client choice alone can not be a justification unless there is a privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail facilities in rural areas can not restrict African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that manage children survivors of sexual assault is permitted.
If an employer were trying to show that employment discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there need to be a factual basis for believing that all or substantially all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task safely and efficiently or that it is not practical to figure out qualifications on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a sinister motive does not convert a facially inequitable policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory impact. [97] Employers likewise bring the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is fairly essential, and a lower inequitable option method does not exist. [98]
Religious employment discrimination
"Religious discrimination is dealing with individuals in a different way in their employment since of their faith, their faiths and practices, and/or their request for accommodation (a change in a work environment rule or policy) of their religions and practices. It also consists of treating individuals differently in their work due to the fact that of their absence of spiritual belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, employers are prohibited from declining to hire an individual based on their religious beliefs- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a worker believes that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they must resolve this to the alleged culprit. On the other hand, staff members are protected by the law for reporting job discrimination and are able to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have clauses that prohibit discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States offer specific exemptions in these laws to organizations or institutions that are religious or religiously-affiliated, however, to differing degrees in various locations, depending upon the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been promoted and others reversed in time.
The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many workers are using religious beliefs against altering the body and preventative medication as a validation to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable workers to get religious exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the employee with employment discrimination on the basis of spiritual beliefs. However, there are certain requirements for employees to present evidence that it is a seriously held belief. [101]
Members of the Communist Party
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination against members of the Communist Party.
Military
The military has actually dealt with criticism for forbiding ladies from serving in combat functions. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was amended to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the method in which black guys were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans a chance to show themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were just allowed to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to safeguard the nation they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids companies from victimizing staff members for previous or present participation or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that give preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been alleged to impose systemic diverse treatment of women since there is a large underrepresentation of females in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim since there was no inequitable intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]
Unintentional discrimination
Employment practices that do not directly victimize a protected category might still be unlawful if they produce a disparate influence on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have a prejudiced impact, unless they are associated to job efficiency.
The Act needs the removal of artificial, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to work that operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to leave out Negroes can not be revealed to be associated with job performance, it is prohibited, regardless of the employer's absence of prejudiced intent. [107]
Height and employment weight requirements have been identified by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]
When defending against a disparate effect claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to demonstrate necessity; rather, it needs to simply reveal that its practice is sensible. [citation required]
Enforcing entities
The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are consisted of in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and guidelines are consisted of in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit fit under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative remedies by filing an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their claim in court. [113]
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination against certified individuals with disabilities by federal contractors and subcontractors. [114]
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each agency has and enforces its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get financial assistance. [16]
The Office of Special Counsel for employment Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which prohibits discrimination based on citizenship status or national origin. [115]
State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the function of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]
See likewise
Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT employment discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination versus persons with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage gap in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit history systems in the United States
References
^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits office predisposition against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment since of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Tabulation". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their working with practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Get ready for employment more US women in combat". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and viewpoints". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links
Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to protect older workers. Weak to start with, she mentions that the ADEA has actually been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.
